London faces the most consequential stretch of environmental policymaking in a generation. Three separate decisions—each carrying multi-billion-pound price tags and direct consequences for millions of residents—are due to land before the end of 2026, and officials in both Westminster and City Hall are running out of runway to delay them.
The pressure is sharpening fast. France recorded 2,025 excess deaths during a single peak week of its June heatwave, and meteorologists at the Met Office have already flagged July and August 2026 as likely to break the 40.3°C UK record set at Coningsby in 2022. That kind of data lands differently in a city where the Transport for London network has roughly 40 per cent of its Underground infrastructure without air conditioning, and where the GLA's own modelling estimates that heat-related mortality in Greater London could rise by 54 per cent by the 2050s under a high-emissions scenario.
The Three Decisions That Cannot Wait
First is the ULEZ boundary. Mayor Sadiq Khan's office confirmed in May that a consultation is underway on extending the Ultra Low Emission Zone beyond the current boundary—roughly following the North and South Circular roads—to cover all 32 boroughs plus the City of London. The scheme as it stands covers about 700 square miles; the proposed extension would bring in suburban areas including Bromley, Havering and Enfield, where older diesel vehicles are still common. A final decision is expected in October. The daily charge for non-compliant vehicles remains £12.50, but the expansion would expose an estimated 1.6 million additional vehicles to that fee, according to TfL projections.
Second is the future of the Silvertown Tunnel green conditions. When the tunnel under the Thames at Silvertown opened in 2025, it came with legally binding traffic-reduction targets in the surrounding Newham and Greenwich areas. Monitoring data published by Transport for London in June showed that traffic volumes on the A1020 Royal Docks Road were 8 per cent above the agreed ceiling. The government has until 31 December 2026 to decide whether to impose the penalty clauses written into the Development Consent Order, which could include mandatory bus lane expansions and a new charging cordon around the tunnel approaches.
Third, and most expensive, is Thames Tideway. The first phase of the super-sewer—a 25-kilometre tunnel running from Acton in the west to Stratford in the east—was completed in January 2026 after years of delays. Tideway's board is now pushing for approval of a second phase connecting tributaries including the River Wandle at Wandsworth and Counters Creek at Hammersmith, where combined sewer overflows dumped raw sewage into the Thames on 68 separate occasions in 2025 alone. The estimated cost of phase two is £4.1 billion. Ofwat and the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero must both sign off; a decision is expected by November.
What the Summer Will Determine
The planning reform agenda running through the Starmer government is relevant here too. The Planning and Infrastructure Bill, currently in its Lords committee stage, contains provisions that could speed up approvals for rooftop solar installations on residential properties across London—an important detail given that Southwark Council alone has a backlog of more than 400 pending solar panel applications. If the Lords amendments pass in their current form, permitted development rights for arrays up to 4kW could be expanded by spring 2027.
For Londoners, the immediate practical question is simpler: act now or wait. Households in the proposed ULEZ expansion zone who are considering scrapping diesel cars should note that the Mayor's scrappage scheme—which offers grants of up to £2,000 for low-income residents and £9,500 for disabled Londoners—is funded only until March 2027, and the pot of £110 million allocated in last autumn's GLA budget is already two-thirds depleted. Waiting for the October decision before applying risks missing the funding entirely. The Environment Agency's Flood Risk register, updated in April, lists more than 480,000 London properties in medium or high flood-risk zones; the Thames Barrier has been closed a record 23 times in the 2025-26 season. The cost of inaction is no longer theoretical.